Definitely awesome work! Thanks for sharing and for the video as well. I don't have the patience for something like that. You and gosmack89 definitely inspired me though.
Also in my honest opinion, applying/using effects for digital art is not in any way cheating. Art can be many things, lots of styles and techniques. I'm more on the digital side of art. Which is what you are but you're more advance and hands on I could say. *shrugs*
What I wanted to say is not the fact that use effect is'nt art, but sometimes, people, jealous most of the time, scream that I'm a cheater, but it's not ! ^^
So thanks again, and again !
(I still apologize for my english, remember, I'm FRENCH xD)
Originally posted by Black_horse: What I wanted to say is not the fact that use effect isn't art, but sometimes, people, jealous most of the time, scream that I'm a cheater, but it's not ! ^^
When people tell you that you are a cheater it's not necessarily because they are jealous. There is that stigma about digital art not being a "true" art that can't be compared to oil or watercolor. People assume that all a digital artists does is takes a photo, runs a few filters on it and calls it "art". How dares he to call himself an artist. And he doesn't even gets his fingers dirty. And he can redo his piece as many times as he wishes. "True" artists don't do any of that, they got "real" skills.
In reality, the whole paragraph above is nothing but a load of BS. Dissing digital art is a personal pet peeve of mine, and I don't even do digital art anymore. And I don't normally rant, but several months ago the ill-conceived arguments against digital artists moved me to write a really long one.
~~~~~~~ CoffeeOwl
I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant. ~ Author unknown ~
Posts: 4828 | Location: Outskirts of Silicon Valley, California | Registered: April 05, 2006
